Chapter 47
Willing and Time—How Purpose Destroys Reality
Time measurement, time fragmentation, and the entire temporal structure of modern civilization emerge from willing's life-destroying nature. As Christianity deified the will, it gave rise to time-measuring science and turned labor into a time-consuming machine, placing the creed "Time is Money!" above the gates of its temples of commerce.
We proceed through four movements:
First, how willing requires poverty of images—stripping away the richness of experience.
Second, how dynamic time consciousness is born from willing's drive against the present.
Third, the contrast between static (past) and dynamic (future) time experience.
Fourth, how expectation breeds hallucination and false perception.
What Willing Requires
Here is something counterintuitive: Willing cannot arise from abundance. It arises from deficiency.
"If what is separated from spirit must be such that nothing remains but a controllable urge to move stripped of the pull of images, then under no circumstances should we see in the strength of this pull the immediate prerequisite of the act that separates it."
When will acts, it strips away the pull of images. It leaves raw urge—pure drive energy without aim or direction.
But this stripping cannot happen when you are filled with images. "It is deficiency and not abundance, disturbance and not harmony, through which in experience the willing is prepared."
The person in full contact with living images cannot will. They are pulled, attracted, held in place by what they perceive. Their soul is satisfied by images.
Only when images are absent—when you experience lack—does willing become possible.
Image Poverty
"We arrive at the willpower of vitality through the pairing of a lack of image capacity—more briefly, through the pairing of poverty of type with unbroken driving force."
Willing arises from poverty of image-reception. You lose the capacity to receive living images. But the driving force remains—raw, aimless, needy.
Think of someone in deep distress—grief, hunger, terror. They are not receiving the richness of living images. They are stripped down to raw drive. And in that poverty, the will can act.
"Whether the capacity of will is more influenced by mental or emotional detachment, or more from soullessness, it is in any case based on a loss of image receptivity and image fertility."
Willpower correlates with soul-blindness. The more willing, the less capable of receiving living images. The more you will, the less alive the world appears to you.
Irritability
This explains irritability—which Klages says reveals "the intensity of drive associated with it must be understood primarily not from depth and fullness but from the disturbance of experience."
An irritable person is not deeply alive. They are disturbed, agitated, reactive. Their soul has lost receptivity.
"Animals too are irritable. Under otherwise comparable circumstances, irritability increases with the strengthening of the self."
Willful individuals are irritable. They are easily agitated because they lack the steady receptivity of deep image-contact. They are thin-skinned, reactive, driven by disturbance.
Desensitization
As willing increases, sensibility decreases: "A being that is nothing but willing would find itself in states of desensitization, in comparison with which even Buddha under the Bodhi tree would remain an image-bound dreamer."
Complete willfulness would mean complete insensibility. You would feel nothing—not beauty, not ugliness, not love, not fear. Only raw drive toward objectives.
Klages provides examples: "The employer who perceives absolutely nothing of the beauty or ugliness of a job applicant, but notices the small spot on his collar that might suggest lack of sense of order; the technician who feels nothing of the sublimity of the flow of electricity, which he nevertheless quickly calculates in 'horsepower.'"
The willful person sees only what serves their purposes. Everything else becomes invisible. They are systematically desensitized to living reality.
The Death Tendency
Here is the most profound point: "A being that desires nothing, because it is devoid of all images, would lose consciousness and—out of the frenzy of its desire to desire—would cease."
A being of pure will—completely stripped of images—would cease to be conscious. Why? Because consciousness requires images. Without images to receive, there is no experience.
This reveals a hidden tendency in all willing: "A tendency that would find its conclusion in the death of consciousness or, objectively expressed, in the cessation of all events."
Willing tends toward its own destruction. The more purely you will, the closer you move toward unconsciousness and death.
Drive Goal Versus Will Goal
Drives aim at images—living presences in space. "Every drive impulse of a positive nature is aimed at uniting with an image, which, being spatial itself, is also capable of appearance and therefore has its place in space."
When you hunger, you seek food. Food is spatial—it has a location. You move through space toward it.
But will aims at purposes—mere concepts. "Every will impulse is directed towards a mere conceptual thing, which however has the peculiarity of hovering as something that should be, and would therefore overcome, if it were granted to realize itself without physical mediation, the present moment by leaving it behind."
A purpose is not here. It is supposed to be. It hovers in front of you as "not yet."
Spatial Absence Versus Temporal Absence
This creates a crucial difference: "The driving goal, measured against the conceptual time, indeed belongs to the future, it is nevertheless experienced as spatial non-presence. The absence of a goal, on the other hand, that I have 'set' for myself is temporal non-presence."
Drive aims at something spatially absent (but temporally present—it exists now, just elsewhere).
Will aims at something temporally absent (not yet existent—not now, but soon).
This distinction creates two kinds of time:
Static time (used to navigate past): Like a spatial line you can look back along. You can see the distance traveled.
Dynamic time (used to navigate future): A push against the present moment, driving it forward.
How Dynamic Time Arises
"If the will aims at something not yet present, its direction of unfolding separates from any spatial direction and thus from space itself, and with the consciousness of purpose, dynamic time, opposite to space, takes the place of the spatially analogous one."
When you will, you experience time as pushing forward. The present moment becomes a resistance you want to overcome. You feel driven to make the not-yet happen now.
This is radically different from how contemplative people experience time—as a distance they can remember.
The Elements of Time Consciousness
The consciousness of time requires four things:
First, "the time of reality—no matter how dark it may be—were not experienced, there would be no succession of events and thus no conceivable time at all."
Life itself flows. Events occur. Without this flow, no time.
Second, "we add the standing space of intuition to the experience of sheer passing"—we create the sense of a present moment from which to look backward.
Third, "in the state of willing, however, from which the state of aiming at a being is supposed to be, does the presentness of the space of intuition become a kind of prison from which it pushes us away."
In willing, the present becomes a prison. You want out of it. You want to move beyond it to the purpose ahead.
Fourth, "the Now" emerges. "Because in the conceptual Now the anticipation of the not-yet-being breaks at the boundary of the actually existing, the line of the past transforms into the time line 'in itself,' which—most comparable to a ray—shares with the spatial line only the directedness (here, however, into the future)."
The Now is the breaking point where your will-toward-future collides with present-reality. From this collision, time emerges as a ray pointing forward.
Time as the Objectivity of Willing
"What is comprehended in the phenomenon of time and thus indeed in reality itself proves to be the objectivity of willing or as the residue of the change that the eternity of passing suffers in the effective play space of will."
Time itself is willing objectified. Time is not a pre-existing structure. Time is what happens when will acts against reality.
Without willing, there would be no time—only the boundless flow of events.
Introspective Confirmation
You can observe this in yourself: When you are planning (willing), the present feels like resistance. You want to speed up, hurry forward.
"Whoever is in a state of lively planning experiences the present moment as a resistance that he wishes to drive forward at an ever faster pace. This is expressed in that when walking, he involuntarily gets into an ever faster stride, but when sitting, he involuntarily feels the urge to get up and walk up and down the room."
The willing person cannot sit still. The present moment pushes them to move, to act, to get on with it.
Conversely, when remembering: "Someone in a state of remembering experiences the moment as the endpoint of a line along which his movement feels its way back into the time-depth of space; which is expressed accordingly in that he, when walking, involuntarily walks slower or even feels the urge to stop and sit down."
The remembering person wants to slow down, to dwell, to look back. The present feels like a vantage point, not a prison.
Historical Contrast
"It is not by chance that the predominantly contemplative antiquity meditated almost exclusively on space and hardly on time, furthermore made movement the subject of penetrating investigations without particularly concerning itself with differences in speed."
Ancient philosophy focused on space. Space is objective, eternal, present-to-perception. Time was barely discussed.
"The voluntarism of Christianity, in contrast, bases all thought about events on the concept of acceleration (Galileo) and henceforth from the increasing necessity for time measurement to the invention of ever more artificial chronometers."
Christianity deified will. This gave rise to obsession with speed, acceleration, time measurement. Galileo's physics is fundamentally about how fast things move—about overcoming spatial distance in time.
Future and Past Consciousness
"If reflection consists in the pairing of the act of perception with the act of judgment—that means with an act of will performed on the occasion of perception—then no finding of existence can be carried out without the involvement of that urge accumulating in the now, which would forcibly drive the moment forward if it were not held back by its weight of reality."
Every judgment contains will. And every judgment presses forward—trying to escape the present weight of reality.
"The awareness of 'I am' thus enables the awareness of 'I was,' as it arises from the experience which, when brought to consciousness, results in the awareness of 'I want to be.'"
The sequence: I am (present) → I was (past) → I want to be (future).
As will develops, future consciousness develops. "With inadequate development of the concept of the future, there regularly goes an understanding of the past that can be labeled as nearsighted perception."
People without strong future-orientation live in a narrow present. Their past is not deep. They are not historically minded.
The Command as Symbol
Consider a sharp command: "Attention—Stand at ease—Shoulder arms—March!"
"No natural event, even if it were a striking lightning bolt, interrupts the pulse of events with such compact suddenness as the properly announced command."
The command tears you out of the flowing present into sharp now-points. Attention. Now. Execute. Now.
This reveals the nature of willing: It fragments the flowing present into discrete points. It says: Now you must do this. Now this. Now that.
The command reveals willing's essence: fragmentation of continuous time into discrete moments of action.
Time Fragmentation
"The more we withdraw hope and will from self-being, the more its presence loses the high note of the present and once again approaches the reality form of the boundless wave. Conversely it becomes a painfully spurring thorn, constantly renewing itself as starting shot for the one who is under the spell of wanting and necessity."
When you stop willing, the present returns to its natural boundlessness. When you will, it becomes fragmented into moments of action.
Duties and work fragment time into hours, days, tasks. This fragmentation is not natural. It comes from willing's demand to overcome the present.
The Christian Legacy
"It was the deification of will in Christianity that gave rise to the time-measuring and consequently time-fragmenting legal language of the 'natural sciences,' and it was again Christianity that turned the equally glorified forced labor into a time-consuming machine, and might suitably place the famous creed 'Time is Money!' above every gate of its temples of Mammon."
Christianity made will sacred. This gave rise to:
- Time measurement (clock time)
- Time fragmentation (hours, minutes, seconds)
- Forced labor organized by time
- The equation of time with money (labor bought and sold by the hour)
Expectation Breeds Deception
"If we give the proverb 'the wish is the father of thought' the twist that expectation is the cause of deception, it reveals to us in the urge of will the inexhaustible source of unteachable illusions."
Your expectations shape what you perceive. You see what you expect to see.
"Because will is only satisfied by success and because the anticipation of realization is something utterly unreal, the urge of will brings with it constant deceptions, partly about the nature and steerability of the course of events, and even more about the levels of ability of the willing."
The will expects success. But expectation is unreal—it is not happening. So the will is constantly disappointed and constantly self-deceiving.
"The mind may rebound off the impossible, but will suggests to it a thousand times the possibility of even the impossible, and if anything eventually breaks humanity's neck, it is the success optimism of the people of will, among whom the most dangerous are the programmatic world-improvers."
Will-driven people are optimists. They believe in progress, in their power to reshape reality. This optimism is unteachable. Even when they fail, they believe they can succeed next time.
Hallucinations and False Perception
"The main source of false perceptions and hallucinations does not lie in the strength of phantasms, but in the pallor and bloodlessness of the sensory realm of a soul whose power of vision has faded from constant aiming."
It is not vivid imagination that creates hallucinations. It is the fading of sensory reality.
When you are constantly aiming (willing), your perception of what is actually present weakens. The world becomes pale, bloodless. Into this pale sensory realm, expectations and fears are easily inserted.
"The more the reality of images is displaced by the illusory reality of purposes and wishes, the more the danger grows that the object of perception itself will be displaced by the hoped-for or feared expectations of desire."
As you become will-driven, you stop perceiving reality. You perceive your expectations instead. The world disappears. In its place appears your imagination of what should be.
This is hallucination—not vivid imagination, but the fading of reality.
The consciousness of time itself arises from willing's drive against the present moment.
Time is not a pre-existing structure of reality. Time emerges when the will presses forward, fragmenting the boundless present into discrete moments of action.
Dynamic time—time as we moderns experience it—is the objectivity of willing. It is what happens when will acts against the flow of reality.
As Christianity deified the will, it created time measurement, time fragmentation, and the equation of time with money. Labor is now bought and sold by the hour. Time is no longer lived but consumed.
The man of action has more illusions than the dreamer. His expectations breed hallucinations. His soul's power of vision fades from constant aiming. The world becomes pale. Into this pale sensory realm, his hopes and fears are inserted as phantom perceptions.
Willing tends toward its own annihilation. Stripped of images, it approaches the death of consciousness.
This is Klages' final verdict: Willing has created time, fragmented it, monetized it, and in doing so has destroyed the living present and replaced it with the will's constant hunger for what is not yet.